How many times have you been in political discussions with friends where you find you're talking past one another? You'll make points they consider irrelevant, whereas they'll focus on issues you consider nonessential. Such problems can be overcome, at least in part, using Arnold Kling's concept of the "Three Languages of Politics."
Paul Hsieh will explain how freedom advocates (e.g., Objectivists and better libertarians), conservatives, and liberals tend to use three vastly different metaphors in political discussions, which can create unintentional misunderstandings and miscommunications. He will also discuss how to frame discussion points so they better resonate with those speaking the other "languages" without compromising on principles.
Listen or Download:
- Duration: [51:15]]
- Download: Standard MP3 File (17.6 MB)
- About the "three languages of politics"
- The differences in the three languages
- The difference that the three languages make
- Examples of the three languages
- Conflict between camps
- Alliances between camps
- Political argument between camps
- The debates over the Hobby Lobby decision
- Using the three languages to become more persuasive
- Caveats and cautions
- Three take-home points
Philosophy in Action Radio, visit the Episodes on Tap and Podcast Archives.