We Stand FIRM
FIRM Home
Blog Home
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Twitter: WeStandFIRM

Contributors
Lin Zinser
Ari Armstrong
Diana Hsieh
Paul Hsieh
E-mail all the bloggers

Blogroll
AFCM
Lucidicus Project
Capitalism Magazine
Principles in Practice
PajamasMedia
Patient Power
Health Care BS
Wolf Files
Bradley Hennenfent
Medpolitics
ReasonPharm
Freedom From The FDA
Medical Progress Today
Concierge Medicine MD
Free Market Cure
ObamaCare Watch
ObamaCare Delenda Est
KevinMD
John Goodman
Covert Rationing
NCPA Digest
Socialized Medicine
State House Call
Big Gov Health
WSJ Health Blog
Free Colorado

Articles/Essays:

"Health Care Is Not A Right"
"FAQ on Free Market Health Insurance"
More Articles/Editorials

FIRM Debates Universal Healthcare on Opposing Views


Archives
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
 Friday, September 4, 2009
How's That Massachusetts Plan Working Out?
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:05 AM PermaLink

In the August 27, 2009 Detroit News, Michael Cannon gives us the most recent update from Massachusetts. It's not a pretty picture.

Here are some excerpts from, "Massachusetts' Obama-like reforms increase health costs, wait times":
In the three years since Massachusetts enacted its individual mandate, providers successfully lobbied to require 16 specific types of coverage under the mandate: prescription drugs, preventive care, diabetes self-management, drug-abuse treatment, early intervention for autism, hospice care, hormone replacement therapy, non-in-vitro fertility services, orthotics, prosthetics, telemedicine, testicular cancer, lay midwives, nurses, nurse practitioners and pediatric specialists.

The Massachusetts Legislature is considering more than 70 additional requirements.

...As goes choice, so goes quality. Statistics on waiting times for specialist care in Massachusetts read like a dispatch from Canada. In 2004, Boston already had the longest waits among metropolitan areas. By 2009, waits had generally shortened in other metro areas (average wait: less than three weeks) but lengthened in Boston (average wait: seven weeks), according to the Merritt Hawkins survey.

...Nevertheless, those costs are appearing in higher taxes and health insurance premiums. State officials have raised taxes on tobacco, hospitals, insurers and employers, as well as eliminated coverage for many legal immigrants just to scrape up their 20 percent share of the cost. They are also showing the nation where ObamaCare would ultimately lead: government-imposed rationing.

To cope with the cost of its reforms, Massachusetts created a legislative commission that has recommended moving the entire market to a single, Canadian-style payment system that would encourage doctors and hospitals to ration care.
(Read the full text of "Massachusetts' Obama-like reforms increase health costs, wait times".)

The trends I discussed a year ago in my article "Mandatory Health Insurance: Wrong for Massachusetts, Wrong for America" (The Objective Standard, Fall 2008), are unfortunately accelerating. Yet this is the precisely the model that many are proposing that we adopt at the national level.

Will America learn from the Massachusetts Mistake?

Labels: ,

E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments