The New York Times reports, "According to Medical Guidelines, Your Doctor Needs a 27-Hour Workday"\
Some excerpts:
The intent is admirable: Give doctors guidelines so they can be sure
to cover what needs to be discussed with patients and help select
options. Let’s talk about your diet and any problems you might have
sleeping. Are you getting enough exercise? If not, here is some advice.
You are due for colon cancer screening. Do you prefer a colonoscopy or a
fecal test? Here are the pros and cons of each.
But there is a problem. There are just not enough hours in a workday to discuss and act on all the guidelines...
[I]magine a doctor shrugged off the chronic and acute care, as
well as administrative work, and merely followed the preventive care
checklist recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an
independent panel of health experts. That would be 8.6 of the doctor’s hours each day, according to a study in the American Journal of Public Health.
As
anyone who has been sped through a 15-minute annual wellness visit
knows, doctors cannot be so exacting. That the guidelines are so
thorough yet so often glossed over prompts questions about their
usefulness. At the same time, doctors’ pay often depends on checking off
guideline boxes.
This is not just a problem in the US:
[I]mplementing all the British guidelines for improving patients’
lifestyles could require more doctors and nurses than are practicing in
the entirety of Britain.
Good intentions from central planners does not always translate to actual good medical practice by physicians on the ground.